E=mc2 (+change)
In normal space that would have liberated a huge amount of energy, but in sufficiently curved space, the energy stays inside the back hole, mass is conserved, nothing to see (literally).
E=mc2 (+change)
In normal space that would have liberated a huge amount of energy, but in sufficiently curved space, the energy stays inside the back hole, mass is conserved, nothing to see (literally).
If you imagine any sphere beneath the event horizon which is centered on the singularity, that sphere is just as inescapable as the farthest such sphere which we call the event horizon.
Additionally, the event horizon is inescapable to everything. Even gravitation is transmitted at the speed of light, and cannot outrun the cascade of inwardly falling spacetime beneath the event horizon. So no possible change in the distribution of mass within a black hole could have any effect on the configuration of spacetime at the event horizon, or even on any spacetime further from the singularity than itself.
So talking about things inside event horizon is about as physical as talking about things traveling at superluminal speeds. You can consider such object, it just takes more than infinite acceleration time to get there.
I don't really understand why people think they can get rid of the discontinuity at event horizon by changing coordinate system. It's as if we were considering function 1/x in new coordinate system xi where xi is defined as 1/x and suddenly we have a nice continuus function without anything special happening around 0. It's a mathematical sleigh of hand.
Sure, from the point of view of infalling matter nothing special happens at event horizon but why would we, outside people, should care about this perspective since the universe will evaporate before this infalling matter crosses event horizon?
So when black hole becomes made of mostly photons, they are all still outside of the event horizon, because infinite time has not yet passed outside.