Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
I don't have to prove that the LLM can't reason. The claims that they can have yet to be proven.
I don't have to prove that the LLM can't reason. The claims that they can have yet to be proven.
"LLMs can't reason"
No OTHER claim was made. So given the fact there was only one claim, Where does the burden of proof lie? Hint: the person who made the claim.