So true!! As a university professor, this nails it. It’s sad — Amsterdam, for instance, used to have such a strong culture of business. But that vitality has greatly diminished.
But I think your analysis of the root causes is lacking. European humans aren't different organisms than non-european humans. Culture does not form in a vacuum. It comes from base properties of the geography and experiences of humans in the region.
In my opinion, it's primarily down to 3 things:
1) Population density: Europe has 3X the population density (and subsequent urbanization) as the US. Urbanization leads to more collectivist attitudes. If you compare European attitudes to those in a high density American location like New York City, you'll be amazed how similar (in everything from religiosity to socialist economic leaning to political philosophy). It's the higher proportion of low population density areas of the US that lead to major differences in political philosophy.
2) Experience of downside risk: European risk aversion is quite easily explained by the fact they have experienced the most extreme version of downside risk imaginable in recent memory (WWII). The worst thing the US knows is a depression. Not total annihilation, fire bombing and markets going to 0.
3) Ethnocentrism: Europe's nationalist ethno-states are far less culturally diverse than the broader US. This leads to a higher capacity of empathy for strangers (because people in a mono-culture are more similar to you, you empathize with them more easily). Ironically though, this empathy is what leads to a higher percentage of GDP being driven by centralized government spending (50% in Europe vs. 30-35ish% in USA). The market is less empathetic, but ultimately more efficient and grows the overall pie faster...even accounting for the additional increase in inequality.
Growth compounds exponentially, so this gets more dramatic over time. People in podunk US Midwest States now have a higher disposable income per capita (on both mean and median measures) than people in London, a place you would traditionally think of as among the richest in the world.
But again, the US didn't get here because 'culture.' It got here due to design decisions made hundreds of years earlier. Being a multicultural society reveals base human racist leanings, which results in more individualist governance, which leads to a greater embrace of markets and private capital, which leads to faster growth.
https://archive.org/details/practical-idealism-english-ver-1...
Nordic countries have small populations due to the limitation of arable land to support humans at all. The US has no such limitation and could support vastly more population.
>Europe has 3X the population density (and subsequent urbanization) as the US.
Are you sure about that?
>...The population density in Europe is 34 per Km² (87 people per mi²).
https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/europe-popula...
>...The population density in the United States is 38 per Km² (98 people per mi²).
https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/us-population...
Is this how american's justify selling their country to the highest bidder? "at least we're not eating toilet paper like the europeans". You know, some of the richest people in the world...
> every single job, iPhone, and modern convenience they enjoy exists because someone, somewhere, took a risk to make a profit.
Amazingly capitalists use things invented by socialists, like satellites, or the LED. Or things invested by Nazis and Monarchists.
Their favourite iPhone is made by communists, with minerals mined by .. well I am not sure what you call em but they are not capitalists
Every day Capitalists use public sanitation, running water, Education, GPS, police and prosecution but they imagine they could exist in a mad max world instead of dying of cholera
50% of European GDP is government spending. The USSR was 70-80%. Meanwhile China is currently at 30%.
China has been a capitalist state since the 70s with a turn to State Capitalism in the 2010s. Furthermore, China's leadership remains anti-Welfarism, with Xi himself making speeches against expanding the already weak social safety net.
> Every day Capitalists use public sanitation, running water, Education, GPS, police and prosecution but they imagine they could exist in a mad max world instead of dying of cholera
Capitalism doesn't preclude public infrastructure. That's just a facile argument.
> the LED
The modern LED was developed by Texas Instruments and Bell Labs in the 1950s.
> like satellites
Both the US and the USSR knew about how to launch satellites in space by the mid-1950s. It was the USSR that chose to prioritize it, and the US that chose to deprioritize it.
I am measuring by the same yardstick as the OP.
If taxes to pay for public services are good capitalism, then you can’t call Europe socialist.
> The modern LED was developed by…
Whatever, take Hyperbaric welding. Will a western oil company refuse to use it because it was invented in USSR?
The fundamental accusation of the OP is totally hypocritical.
Fair enough! Didn't see their argument. Yea that was dumb.
Do you think those miners are volunteering out of revolutionary solidarity? Or perhaps "disposable cogs in the global supply chain" was the term you were looking for?
Miners were getting paid in USSR too, are they capitalist too by this logic?
Because if they do, then capitalism is horrible, and if they do not, then the argument made by the OP is hypocritical
Pedantic but counterpoint, Markus Villig.
Who told you that?
Spotify though, is Europe's own.
Clearly, he considers Stripe to be an American phenomenon.
People are also happier in most European countries than they are in the US, because the constant competition for wealth and using wealth as the measure of what everyone is worth is not good for mental health and does not lead to a peaceful society, but one where people are set against each other. Europe has problems, but fixing them with capitalism is not going to lead to better lives for most people.
This sounds plausible on the surface, but by putting them all in the same basket you show that you have no idea what you are talking about : it's a bit like blaming wokists for their voting for Trump because wokists are from the USA and Trump was elected in the USA...
Those are some big assumptions about 750 million people. Would love to see the data on this.
> In America, a 20-year-old can drop out of college, code an app in his dorm, and become a billionaire. In Europe? Good luck.
Assuming that's the case with you, right? And if not, then why not if it's so simple? Everybody knows that these cases are extremely rare, but they do happen both in the US and in the EU.
> The ultimate proof that Europe's system is broken? Its smartest people leave. Engineers, doctors, entrepreneurs, they all flee to the U.S., Switzerland, or Singapore, where they're allowed to keep what they earn.
Again, would love to see the data on this. Based on my own personal anecdata, one of the reasons why IT engineers don't move to the US despite being offered to do so is because they enjoy the other benefits of living in the EU, like high-speed rail, free health-care, free higher education, being car independent, childcare benefits and having more days off.