Basically, what I wanted to say was: "Here is an article on building a prototype coding agent in Ruby that explains how it works and the code is just 94 lines so you'll really be able to get a good understanding just by reading this article."

But that's a bit too long for a title. :)

Also, a big benefit of Ruby is how concise it is. Yes, there's a library under neath my code but that library is, like Ruby, also very concise. That's kind of the point.

I can see how you might have read the title as hype-ish, but that was not my intention.

The imports indeed take away from that.

You can also do it without imports in about the same number of lines, if you strip it down a bit.

As CTO at Redo do you demand everything written in assembly? Does your entire company’s code run in one file or do you use abstraction to simplify?

I’m not quite clear on how expressing a really complex and paradigm shifting approach of agents in a more concise way is a bad thing