This would’ve been three acquisitions straight for me and… I’m okay, they’re awful. I just want stability.
Congrats to the neon team! I use and love neon. Really hope this doesn’t change them too much.
This would’ve been three acquisitions straight for me and… I’m okay, they’re awful. I just want stability.
Congrats to the neon team! I use and love neon. Really hope this doesn’t change them too much.
In a couple cases I’ve been recruited because I have a history of scaling and integrating acquisitions into companies successfully
Walking into something like that is tough because the two teams sort of don’t like each other and you’re really “neither”. I’d want to make sure I was interviewed by both teams
IMO, this is where the power of being hired into the situation is. No existing bias for either company and all the baggage that comes with that.
Allows a person to see the pros and cons of how things get done on both sides of the fence, and act accordingly
It led to some serious burnout and I took several months off. I'm now happily working as an IC again.
My guess is that this team gets rolled into Online Tables tech, which would make product sense.
https://docs.databricks.com/aws/en/machine-learning/feature-...
I mean, hindsight 20/20 here, but I would have loved the theoretical money @ 1 billion. But those are so rare and my experience in the past 15 years hasn’t matched those unicorns.
Basically I’ve come to the conclusion unless you have serious equity or you’re a founder, acquisition suck. You’re the one doing the work making these two companies come together, while the founders usually bounce or are stripped of any real power to change things.