Hacker News Reader

I'm quite perplexed by the following point:

Counterintuitive Performance: The best-performing configuration actually achieved 146.84% accuracy preservation in a Mars radiation environment - meaning it performed better under radiation than in normal conditions.

How can it perform better in a radiation environment than under normal conditions? My immediate gut feeling is that something is very wrong.

That said, not my usual cup of tea this.

View on HN

Anything's possible. That part is mostly clickbait for marketing, but at the same time, I wasn't focused on that part too much, just a stat I saw while testing and used it to market. I'll probably explore the situation more down the road to see how sound the theory is, but overall, the framework has a solid foundation even if we were to take that part out.It was mostly the random noise though would be the simplest answer.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com