Yes. this statistics included the previously imposed 20% tariffs, but on China's side, it only included this newly added 125% without accounting for the previous countermeasures against the 20%.

Though it's worth noting China's initial counter-tariffs only targeted key products, so the presentation isn't technically incorrect.

That's why I said it is a good propaganda.

They have a good diagram here:

https://edition.cnn.com/2025/04/12/business/us-china-tariffs...

I think it's because they both agreed to cancel the latest round of tariffs and to both lower them to 10%, instead, however the previous 20% imposed by the US (so-called "fentanyl tariff") is not included, which brings effective levels to 30% and 10%.

This means a lower general rate that the US have imposed on Taiwan (32%), btw...