This pushes me to use other models that aren't necessarily better, but that at least don't clam up when I am not even trying to get anything other that general summaries of research.
This pushes me to use other models that aren't necessarily better, but that at least don't clam up when I am not even trying to get anything other that general summaries of research.
Scalable historical revisionism would only turbocharge societal conflict.
the latest Gemini models have a very low hallucination rate in benchmarks [0]. Feel free to try it yourself. Just go to gemini.google.com, choose Deep Research, and ask it to write a report about a topic that you're intimately familiar with.
Does the new Gemini have feet to go around and investigate? Does it reach out or have contacts to sources with the right knowledge? Does it even have critical thinking skills? Or is it just a robot spitting out plausible sounding word salad?
These things are crucial, especially when it comes to topics like history where there are highly malicious actors with infinite resources and motivation trying to rewrite history.
"Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past." - 1984, George Orwell