Actually critisizing DOGE for their major gaffes (like putting up easily defaceable websites, or their incompetence when it comes to reading numbers accurately) is important, but this kind of article is just sad and diminishes the credibility of news journalism
If your password is in the dumps, too, like this person's passwords, then yeah, you might want to look into it.
Indeed the ones getting hacked are more likely to.
> user names and passwords for logging in to various accounts belonging to Schutt have been published at least four times since 2023 in logs from stealer malware.
So this isn't from website dumps with plaintext passwords.
"No domains were found for your email address. Whilst your email address was found in a stealer log, no websites were found alongside it. This can be due to the way the log was formatted."
TL;DR: You could try my email in there, believe credentials were stolen, when that might be recycled leak stuffing.
Stop reading Ars and your name will be cleared. This isnt real journalism, it is Ars-washed political talking points.
If you had to work in the nightmare of secure systems, the computers are literally in a different room, there is no Internet access in there, and you can’t take your smartphone in there.
It means the people in the leak had malware on their computer in the past, and maybe present.