Either way, there are plenty of other serverless Postgres options out there, Supabase being one of the most popular.
Either way, there are plenty of other serverless Postgres options out there, Supabase being one of the most popular.
You set up a database, you connect to it, they take care of the rest. It even scales to $0 if you don't use it.
Is that not serverless Postgres?
Supabase gives you a server that runs classic Postgres in a process. Scaling in this scenario means you increase your server's capacity, with a potential downtime while the upgrade is happening.
You are confusing _managed_ Postgres for _serverless_.
Others in the serverless Postgres space:
- https://www.orioledb.com/ (pg extension)
- https://www.thenile.dev/ (pg "distribution")
- https://www.yugabyte.com/ (not emphasizing serverless but their architecture would allow for it)
How is what Supabase offers different from what Neon offers from a user perspective?
After a funding round the value extraction from customers is just over the horizon