I agree with what you’re explicitly stating, but I can’t tell if you acknowledge and accept the implications.

As it stands, your statement boils down to “DEI is not diverse enough.”

If one also accepts gp’s point, then it seems DEI should continue, but be applied more carefully and thoughtfully. This would likely mean an increase in resources dedicated to DEI.

I agree and would welcome this (without requiring it legally). But I doubt most others would agree.