That must be a restriction imposed on the court by Florida law - I think it’s pretty well established that ICE detainers alone don’t mandate anything of state courts or law enforcement.

Even ICE’s website says this:

> Immigration detainers are only requests. They don’t impose any obligations on law enforcement agencies https://www.ice.gov/immigration-detainers#:~:text=Immigratio...

In Massachusetts where I live, the courts flat out ignore them and release individuals who are not accused of any crime, because:

> Massachusetts law provides no authority for court officers to arrest and hold an individual because of a federal immigration detainer

https://www.mass.gov/decision/lunn-v-commonwealth

Otherwise… I have no idea why the judge would just cave to the prosecutor’s argument like that.