[flagged]
Low wage worker fired over a misinterpretation of a snapchat: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/ottawa-social-media-po...
9 year old getting called racist by a newspaper: https://apnews.com/article/defamation-deadspin-nfl-football-...
Man fired because he was cracking his knuckles: https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/502975-cal...
Another alleged white power symbol accusation: https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/tv/tv-news/jeopardy-slamme...
The only examples you gave are rapists.
I can only speak for me, but it is extraordinarily unlikely to the point of impossibility that I will commit rape.
If I do, I expect people to "cancel" me.
That's great.
What do you think are the odds that someone will accuse you of rape? I suspect they're higher than "unlikely to the point of impossibility". Cancellations usually happen based on the accusation, not the conviction.
It's like saying jail isn't real because some ex-convicts have successful careers.
If you want a name: an interesting, recent example is Gina Carano because she's actually suing her former employer (Disney) for going along with a cancellation. We'll see what the court thinks her cancellation was worth.
You're choosing not to engage in good faith with those who you disagree with by claiming the very basis of their language is made up and therefore invalid.
Do you really think that's an appropriate vehicle to engage with anyone if the goal is constructive dialog toward resolution?
You can do better than this, as can everyone else on both sides of the aisle who others the opposition to a state of incoherent invectives. You can certainly do much better than engaging with me in the patronizing and insulting way you have.