> The PS3 failed developers because it was an excessively heterogenous computer
Most here are probably too young to realize the PS3 was supposed to be a flagship consumer device to show off the Cell processor and Sony was pushing hard for the Cell arch to be everywhere, media devices, general purpose computers, next gen supercomputers
It died hard when people realized how difficult it was to program for, and I dont think anything else other than the PS3 ever bothered seriously trying again with that arch.
Yes it did, fairly near the top.
>>It is important to understand why the PS3 failed.
This article is a bunch of nonsense.
> It is important to understand why the PS3 failed.
Full disclosure: I have been doing The Internet for well over 30 years. :)
"including the title" was intended to attach to the line count. Some may include the page title (h1 heading in HTML) in the lines at the start of the page. Some may not, because the title isn't necessarily part of the article itself. I was trying to disambiguate.
I was not trying to say that the "PS3 failed" was in the title.
You're right that it's in the URL but I didn't see that until you pointed it out.
Being pedantic is not an interesting position.