1) what are my rights, I.e. Against what constraints was the algorithm implemented?
2) "we have decided": who is "we", it's actually good that a particular entity is responsible for the output of the algorithm, computers can't be responsible for things.
3) is there appeal or human review?
If a bad algorithm is part of some process that affects me I'm going to ask what my rights are, who's responsible and where I can appeal, not the specifics of the algorithm.
Funny enough I read not that long ago about a case where an algorithm broke all those three points! Can’t remember where of the top of my mind, I think it was the Louisiana Prison board or something like that.
But never mind that, you are arguing against yourself so I’ll kindly step aside and let you at you.
They are not OP. Even if they are, why not just engage with the points they raise?