I tried Shiny a few years back and frankly it was not good enough to be considered. Maybe it's matured since then--I'll give it another look.
> Not having a Django-like or others web stack python may have talks more about the users of R than the language per se. Its background was to replace S which was a proprietary statistics language not to enter competition with Perl used in CGI and early web.
I'm aware, but that doesn't address the problem I pointed out in any way.
> R is very powerful and is Lisp in disguise coupled with the same infrastructure that let you use C under the hood like python for most libraries/packages.
Things I don't want to ever do: use C to write a program that displays my R data to the web.
For capital P Production use I would still rewrite it in rust (polars) or go (stats). But that’s only if it’s essential to either achieve high throughput with concurrency or measure performance in nanoseconds vs microseconds.
Thanks for posting!