[flagged]
>we don't know wha tthat woman did.
All she did was write a piece against israel, and either way, her due process was violated, which is the problem here. She was not charged with any crimes... How are you seriously hung up on the video source when there's a video of masked, plain clothes federal agents "arresting" a random PhD student with no warrant, and no crimes committed?
Frightening barometer reading for this community that this is what you focus on...
You literally asked AI to write your argument for you: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43530149
Maybe cool it on the source policing.
The article was worded extremely slantingly. It was at least clear to me. In emotional contexts, it's best to stick to the least biased stories you can find.
Yes, that is the problem.
It would be less concerning if it was not clear to you. Sharing that it was clear to you is evidence of the very deficiency in judgement that everyone is highlighting.
You are woefully ill-equipped to be making such assessments, yet you continue to do it with confidence despite everyone telling you why you're wrong.