You know that, I know that. But in a polarised two-party system critism or even “added context” can quickly be seen as partisan.
The idea a political party owns the Constitution, gets to define what it means contrary to the text, is as untruthful as 2+2≠4
It’s that basic.
Make them reject the Constitution outright. Some people associated with the regime have done exactly that. If it’s not wrong, why hide it? They admit their opposition to the Constitution.
If suspected criminal non-citizens are persons, the law says persons get due process. If the simplest reading of text can be set aside by mere opinion, on what basis can’t it be set aside for anybody at anytime based on an updated opinion, equally contrary to the law?
No one is safe at all.