In my language, the poetry I've gotten LLMs to generate far surpasses the human generated slop sold in local bookstores.
I fully expect current 'poets' will start using this and the lines will be forever blurred.
In my language, the poetry I've gotten LLMs to generate far surpasses the human generated slop sold in local bookstores.
I fully expect current 'poets' will start using this and the lines will be forever blurred.
What kind of gatekeeping is this? Parent mentioned they're read poems from their local bookstores, does that mean they don't/do understand it "as an art form"? Does their opinion become more or less valid if they do understand it "as an art form"?
I am ABSOLUTELY gatekeeping whether their opinion should hold weight when opining on the trajectory of a millenia-old art form.
If you ask an LLM to "Write me a poem", expect the equivalent of what others are calling analogous to hotel art: generic and inoffensive. However, if you inject your personalized soul and suffering into the context window, there's no reason not to expect the transformation of that soul into indistinguishably human-like prose.
I won't share the full content, because it was personalized to me and my moment.
I am quite curious though, how art without an author will grow into society.