Didn't zuck literally say that? How's that debunked?
So the worse that Musk's personally selected journalists could find was a special process that political figures from both parties had where their abuse reports were getting prioritized.
> The most worrying issue the Twitter Files have exposed is the level of contact between the social media company and state security organisations. The FBI regularly holds meetings with Twitter executives, pressuring them to take action against “misinformation”, even when this amounted to little more than a satirical tweet, and demanding the personal data of users.
Take note of the "pressuring", in line with what was reported by Zuck.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/jan/01/the-tw...
https://x.com/shellenberger/status/1604888013422485505
Whether or not you think that’s reasonable from a surveillance perspective it’s nothing even remotely like the “state-sponsored media” claim.
edit since I can't reply:
The thread went
> It was state-sponsored media when the Biden administration colluded with Twitter and Facebook to censor Americans. reply
> debunked
> didn't zuck literally say that
...
It's so sad that people want their take to be correct that they can't even follow a thread 2 ideas deep...
To prevent this you need social media to not have central gatekeepers in a position to censor things to begin with.