http://www.minneapolisfed.org/publications_papers/studies/re...
Your comment implies that in the case of a disastrous implosion of the global economy, the window of predictability would be so narrow that there would be no point in trying to anticipate it; and that while we wait to see what's going to happen, there's no use listening to the ongoing chatter of "hand waving, theories and speculation".
But is that really true?
I think it behooves us to keep evaluating information as it streams in. (Attempting to discount the speculators and "people trying to Prove a Point, as always.)
The lucky ones?
This is true. In the case of repeatable events, over time, the former will do better than chance and the latter will do as well as chance.
I'm talking about the former, not the latter.
Anyway thanks for the recommendation.