I saw someone saying 80% of doctors believe that LLM's are trustworthy consultation partners.
Code created by LLM's doesnt compile, hallucinated API's.. invalid syntax and completely broken logic, why would you trust it with someones life !
Code created by LLM's doesnt compile, hallucinated API's.. invalid syntax and completely broken logic, why would you trust it with someones life !
I imagine we're talking about it as an extra resource rather than trusting it as final in a life or death decision.
I'd like to think so. Trust is also one of those non-concrete terms that have different meanings to different people. I'd like to think that doctors use their own judgement to include the output from their trained models, I just wonder how long it is till they become the default judgement when humans get lazy.
Black-box decisions I absolutely have a problem with. But an extra resource considered by people with an understanding of risks is fine by me. Like I've said in other comments, I understand what it is and isn't good at, and have a great time using ChatGPT for feedback or planning or extrapolating or brainstorming. I automatically filter out the "Good point! This is a fantastic idea..." response it inevitably starts with...
In fact, the phenomenon of pseudo-intelligence scares those who were hoping to get tools that limited the original problem, as opposed to potentially boosting it.
See, now that is something I don't know why I should trust: a random person on the internet citing a statistics that they saw someone else say.
Unlike the LLM, i'm willing to be truthful about my memory.
The irony...