This guy must have some strong connections to get this sort of coverage out of an AI wrapper + a few gimmicky twitter posts
It isn’t that he made AI wrapper, it’s that he pointed out the king has no clothes with it.
Or some alternative, there is some trusted third party monitoring the candidate.
We have had people use AI in our interviews and fail miserably. We have always allowed people to search and use other resources during our interviews, and made the decision that using chat was fine as long as we could see what you were doing.
If its for a high paying position I can see someone doing this for like ~$10k (contigent on them getting an offer) which is not bad for likely a few hours work.
Math, which is more than arithmetic, is still important in the age of calculators.
Using a tool does not substitute for clear thinking and deep experience, which is what they're trying to test for.
They may but do not necessarily test for clear thinking and deep experience.
There is something very frustrating about living this experience and being surrounded by folks who refuse to admit it is real. Those same folks who couldn't help in those times.
It's fine, it's not always required for every job, but I sure as heck would appreciate working with folks who can describe set cover or what have you. I work where I work though. So, it's different all over. But to unilaterally say it's invalid is just plain wrong.
It's a small club, and the rest of us aren't in it.