But illegal and legal immigrants from other countries mainly consume taxpayer resources and spread crime and violence.
But non-Western immigrants are more likely to commit crimes (i.e. on a per-capita basis).
This blog post goes into some detail, and also adjusts by sex & age (also important!).
https://inquisitivebird.xyz/p/the-effects-of-immigration-in-...
You can easily confirm the basic “Danish origin vs non-Western immigrants” statistics by doing simple math from official sources.
https://www.dst.dk/en/Statistik/emner/sociale-forhold/krimin...
Persons of Danish origin commit 75% of crime yet represent 84% of the population. Immigrants are only 16% of population yet commit 25% of crime.
Or is official Danish statistics lying?
You not acknowledging there's a racial bias just makes you a racist.
Until you propose solutions to rising crime, rape and fracturing societal trust, then I'll listen.
Improving the living conditions and let it be known that equal opportunities exist and are viable would improve the situation.
Because when a person with dark skin is fully aware that the nice jobs aren't open to them, they'll behave consequently.
But of course you think all dark people are criminals so you wouldn't hire a dark person. You're part of the problem.
Maybe because people have been duped so much in the last 10+ years to know that the loaded statement of "more immigration" from the government only means legalizing more ILLEGAL immigration, driving them to hate all forms of immigration because the governments have proven themselves useless at enforcing border controls and depurations of those who brake the law.
That's the result that you get when you maliciously sweep ILLEGAL immigration under the same political banner used for legal immigration, as the liberal European governments have done, so you end up hurting the image of legal immigration as well but this is the fault of politicians, not the people whoa have suffered form illegal immigration and have next to no channels of changing this other than voting far right.
When you use a list of tattoo elements to identify "Venezuelan gang members" and that list is also matched by the cheap options on the wall of any random tattoo shop, you tend to get a lot of false positives.
Mr. Mota can absolutely stay in my neighborhood.
Getting stabbed on the street vs somebody giving a government contract to a buddy? If I must choose, I’d rather take the later tbh.
Why do you worry more about the very unlikely events and not at all about the almost sure events?
https://www.msnbc.com/all-in/watch/-incredible-trump-admin-r... https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/mar/20/deported-bec...