“Don’t worry, I’m not one of those silly TESCREALs, I’m just a transhumanist!”
What does this distinction add to or take away from the thrust of the analysis?
>Transhumanism is a philosophical and intellectual movement that advocates the enhancement of the human condition by developing and making widely available new and future technologies that can greatly enhance longevity, cognition, and well-being
Which isn't a cult, just tech to live better etc. Making out it's something else makes the argument a bit meaningless.
I think that transhumanism (the way that you'd find on wikipedia) is a noble pursuit and what article describes is a bunch of hogwash that I'd never hear of outside of anglosphere.