Also, most EU launches are from French Guiana, which is a part of France and therefore a part of the EU, so there have been commercial space launches from the EU(the polity), just not from Europe(the landmass).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soyuz_at_the_Guiana_Space_Cent...
Was nice having world peace from a NATO's point of view in 2011-2013.
Russian launches continued till third wave of Ukraine territory conflicts in 2022, says wikipedia.
- Closeness to the equator.
- Ease of access by rail.
- Lack of populated/foreign areas at the path of falling booster stages.
- Relative closeness to production centers.
- Far enough from borders and small population around the site to make spying harder (remember that in the early days it was also an ICBM launch site).
Other central Asian Soviet republics were farther south, but much worse on the other factors.
Russia simply continues to use it because of the existing infrastructure and tries to gradually move its civilian space program to the new Vostochny Cosmodrome.
It's going to be hard to find a space rocket company which has 0% state involvement (e.g. Isar Aerospace and SpaceX have also accepted some amount of funding through venture rounds or contracts one way or the other at some point which can be traced back to governments, or purchased use of government launch facilities) by nature of "why wouldn't you accept a government launch at some point if you've already built a cost efficient rocket" or the like... but I think it's fair for Isar to claim to be launching the first commercial European space rocket since the program to build the rocket wasn't initiated by a state space agency or fulfilling a state agency contract by doing the initial flight.