> ... who tried to enter from Mexico after being denied entry from Canada instead of resolving the issue with the embassy as she was told. Plus some more sketchy shit.
Let's establish a timeline...
- She applied for a visa, and was denied.
- She applied again, went to the Mexican border because that's close to her immigration's lawyer office, and was allowed entry.
- At some point, she tried to enter the country, and the border guard thinks the above was shady (and you're accepting this guard's judgement. A lawyer would ask "What law did she break?").
- A week or 2 ago, she applied again, she went to the Mexican border for the same reason as above. Why is that sketchy? Immigration checkpoints should work the same anywhere, they're all connected anyway.
- At this point she's told she should've gone to a consulate to fix the problem. She's denied entry at the border and she looks for flights home.
- A few moments later she's arrested for who knows what and detained for an inderteminate amount of time.
- 3 days later, not knowing how long she'll be detained, someone tells her "be prepared for months.".
I get that asking for accountability from a unaccountable bureaucrats working in a corrupt police state is a moot point, but what law did she break that justified her detainment? Not knowing she should've gone to a consulate? Thinking there's some exploit in the system that different borders have different rules instead of them being all connected, and should treat everyone equally? Oh, some "shady shit" is enough excuse for you?
OK, maybe what she wrote isn't the whole thing. Maybe the corrupt police state will issue a statement to fill in the gaps. Would I believe that corrupt police state?