And other than that? Pure HTML.
It’s downright lovely. And it’ll still work fine 20 years from now.
And other than that? Pure HTML.
It’s downright lovely. And it’ll still work fine 20 years from now.
bold claim. A Rails project of 20 years would not work fine today without a lot of work.
It’s like a car. If you’re going to run it, you’ll need to do periodic maintenance.
I didn’t claim you could run it for 20 years without touching it.
I slightly tease here, but really these are all leadership decisions that you can simply decide against. I would never implement those things because they're largely profit-less decisions.
Having 2 apps that operate slightly differently is okay—even under the same brand.
Perhaps if you those two apps are in completely different domains, but if you have a suite of apps that are all related, maintaining consistent styling and behaviour provides a much better user experience.
Essentially what you're saying is rails isn't capable of solving that problem, and if you're talking about efficiencies/profit, implementing a component _once_ is a better strategy, and actually less complicated than two similar implementations of the same component.
I’ll also point out, sure, better UX, but again—not profitable. Look at Microsoft, one of the largest software companies in the world and people still use their awful products despite no consistent UX.
This isn’t a Rails problem, it’s a leadership problem.
Step 1 - don't grow
Considering there’s a near-zero chance you won’t be starting the next Facebook or Stripe, “Don’t grow” is a great philosophy. If you do happen to hit that 0.1%, congratulations you’ve got money to tear everything down and rewrite it in the JavaScript framework du jour.
This is like gym beginners worrying they'll get too bulky overnight. You don't want to start with a don't grow philosophy. That's a thing to think when you are big enough.
You can start with a Don’t Grow mentality. I have, and it’s working out great. My company makes choices based on that principle, and we’re profitable. But we understand that we don’t want to be a huge corporate conglomeration and never will be.