> Despite Plausible's claim of not requiring cookie banners, their processing still accesses data from the terminal equipment.
Since Plausible is selling a product that clearly claims this, who is on the hook in case a user of Plausible gets a fine?
Since Plausible is selling a product that clearly claims this, who is on the hook in case a user of Plausible gets a fine?
But GDPR enforcement is more like 'you need to fix this, if you don't you get the fine' - if you are actually helpful and do your duty to improve the process the fine is usually reduced.