The phrasing you use is all marketing. When people share actual chat threads that they claim helped them, they always have the same issues I observe in my own use.
They won't do the thinking for you. You still have to know what you want out of it, you have to know your endpoint, and you have to be able to review and understand every line out of it, but they do save time. You might have tried to use them in situations where they aren't appropriate. They are text prediction programs, but they're extremely powerful text prediction programs. If you accept their unreliability and give them the right patterns and context to generate from, they can write a thousand lines of code in one go that look identical to what you would have written, and it takes 30 seconds to generate and a few minutes to review and test, compared to the half an hour at least that it would have taken otherwise. It can easily yield 10 times efficiency gain in places where it's really appropriate.
That said, it's not perfect by any means. To be really what I want, I need the same quality significantly faster, cheaper, and local. If my company wasn't paying for it, I certainly wouldn't pay to use this thing myself. This costs between $0.05 and $1 per request, which gets expensive fast, and the much cheaper models are less capable enough to save me so little time as to not be worth the bother really.
People have been sharing that, plus the problems they’ve solved or products they’ve made.
Though, most of these workflows are no longer really just “chats” at like chatgpt.com. A lot of that has changed.
i’m not saying you need to do it, or change anything, but… i’ve seen people do shit with a computer lately that 6 months ago would seem weird and alien.
Do you have video?