I don't think boycotts are primarily about tariffs. I think it's more a response to the "Governor Trudeau" and "51st state" remarks, and similar. To the extent they are about tariffs I'd assume it's mostly just how they were introduced (rehetoric, process).

[flagged]

if the US feels Canada isn't following whatever the fuck Trump made them rename NAFTA, then he's welcome to use the dispute resolution section of the treaty to get satisfaction, instead of being a massive cunt to the US's closest ally and neighbour.

What protectionist tariffs has Canada imposed on the USA exactly before Trump's trade war?

> And so, no, you’re are wrong, these are not tariffs for nothing. Stop lying.

But you... Did? There was a free trade agreement, negotiated and signed by the same president you put back into the White House, it's just NAFTA with another name, and even with that they decided to put tariffs on Canada. There's no rhyme or reason to do that, no matter how much you attempt to be a pushover with an absolutely empty argument.

Are they wrong, or are they lying?