That said, this stylistic choice works for computer security related things (e.g. the spy genre of news). It feels like a waste of time everywhere else.
That said, this stylistic choice works for computer security related things (e.g. the spy genre of news). It feels like a waste of time everywhere else.
"Years before she became the peculiar central thread linking a double homicide in Pennsylvania, the fatal shooting of a federal agent in Vermont and the murder of an elderly landlord in California, a computer programmer bought a sailboat."
I wanted to keep reading, so I guess I was their audience - not everything has to be up to your personal standards to be worth while.
As parent mentioned. You do have a choice not to read novels, or to read novels. That doesn't make a novel bad because it is a novel.
Perhaps AI could help here by rewriting the article into the format it should have used, but then you risk hallucinations.
In short, you appear to only be familiar with the mandated style for factual news-reporting - not for other journalistic output - and seem to think all deviation is in error.
Here's an example from one of the kings of the form - Michael Lewis - and his award-winning piece of financial journalism regarding the Greek bond crisis that nearly brought down the Euro:
https://archive.vanityfair.com/article/2010/10/beware-of-gre...
Thankfully, there's a variety of writing styles, so that every one of us can find something we enjoy reading and skip the stuff we don't enjoy.
I don't see why you should be the sole arbiter of what writing style is allowed.