The “fail to serve” wording in the headline is unnecessarily rage-baity.
It’s an interesting proposal, but trying to shame people into adopting proposed things is more likely to generate groans and disinterest in 2025 than to win converts.
It’s an interesting proposal, but trying to shame people into adopting proposed things is more likely to generate groans and disinterest in 2025 than to win converts.
But when you conflate that with some sort of expectation or "minimum effort" and try to shame people with it you signal something else, particularly to people who disagree with the value of said standard. I've had people show me my domains on "DNSSEC Hall of shame" site and my opinion of that site's existence lowers every time.