Attempted humiliation and bullying does not make for a good deals as far as I've seen.
Perhaps related to the discussion:
The Scientific Art of Negotiating with a Possibly Irrational Opponent by William Spaniel
On the other hand this might all just be trying to pretend there's a coherent strategy when its all just actually chaos.
If you doubt any of this, then as you say, watch and learn.
I am probably somewhat guilty myself, but I think a lot of people want someone or some group of people to take action on their behalf. Sadly, that is unlikely to happen.
That might be what Trump and Putin want, but they are not the only interested parties here, and Trump is certainly succeeding at waking whatever beast-like qualities the EU/NATO may have left somewhat hidden in the recent past.
The cost to Russia has been steep, but I think Russia is walking away from this feeling good. Russia's borders are vast and undefendable so they view it as existentially important to control their bordering states as buffers. When one of them flirts with joining NATO they view it with almost the seriousness with which the USA would view, I don't know, California flirting with becoming a part of China.
Why does Russia care if US are being tough on Ukraine? POTUS can issue an EO saying all fundings are cut and not be an asshole about it. If the US wants to be isolated from the war, they can do it without insulting Zelenskyy or trying to get a mineral deal done.
Here's the real deal: Trump is a Russian asset, and it is already a foregone conclusion that Ukraine is getting fucked. This is just theatre so he can pin the whole thing on Zelensky.
My hot take is Matt Gaetz, the Greenland purchase and the Canada as the 51st state were all distraction techniques to get the other nominees through.
You mean the deal Zelenskyy didn't sign prior to leaving? That one?
It's an awfully poor look trying to come off so confidently snarky when you don't even have your facts straight.
Edit:
>(somebody says something unique, from a different perspective in the middle of a circle jerk, and all the tossers lose their shit)
"Unique"? There are multiple responses highlighting that your facts are wrong. You're choosing to ignore those points and instead gripe about having a "unique" take?