Many subscription services don't allow you to subscribe from your iPhone. Why? Because if they did they'd have to pay Apple 30% for the privilege. And Apple has made it against their rules to notify users of this.
And for the ones that eat it, they're not allowed to give users a 25% discount for going to their website.
This is what Epic did to prove user harm, they made it cheaper to buy currency through their processor than Apple's. Of course they were banned for it.
That is literally already the case for many apps. Many offer a better price outside of the iOS ecosystem.
And why are you drawing the goalposts at EVERY developer?
Who knows whether or not current apps will have their prices lowered, but it would be better if in the future, new apps are not priced 43% higher than they would have been, like all the current ones.
* 1/(1-0.30) = 1.43
An awful lot of people do care about these issues, even if they never heard of sideloading they'll jump on it if offered the opportunity.
But I want a new laptop.
Really eyeballing a MacBook. But I fear the locking down of osx is likely to continue. But seems great hardware.
The other side of the coin I see is framework. Hardware maybe not as wow whiz bang, but future freedoms in all the ways.
Am I correct to worry about osx lock in, and 'sideloading' on osx being fully removed vs pain in the ass?
I can't seem to find the darn sweet spot.
It's more of a resource question. I tend to keep my hardware around for a long while. I like to repurpose it for various little things. A have a netbook grabbing sdr data in an outbuilding and shuffling data to living room server to be processed (goes weather). Server is an old Dell workstation. Etc.
My worry is the 2 i5 iMacs I have upstairs. Old, yes. Upgraded to the extent they can be? Yes! Useful hardware? Honestly, yeah.
Except they can't get newer versions of osx, this the cricut machine will not work on them. This I have to use parallels z with windows , to make the 27" iMac use the cricut because... Osx can't be upgraded. (Brave browser has hit its point too).
With the old stuff it's fine because I figure I'll eventually put some sort of Linux on it and have a useful thing, still.
The new m* looks so nice. And quick. And sleek. And I just fear 5 years down the road, when it's still nice, and fast and sleek but you can't even open a webpage because safari will not upgrade, and the world slowly crumbles around the hardware, which becomes. . Useless.
So it's not so much personalization but being able to just continue using that of which was purchased. I've been buying pixels because of the same reason. Maybe I won't keep it for forever, but I upgraded from a pixel 3 last year and that's only because I broke a BMS wire behind the battery and said "well, a new phone is cheaper than a new house when it burns down because I'm a cheap ass".
So, does one sacrifice some new shiney to have a device that you still can use if the apple gods (or whomever gods, it all seems to be forced obsolete).
Huge blabber rant, but it's such a weird market now it seems like. No problem going ARM on apple, just wish Linux efforts seemed to be heading in a more positive direction (hector, quit? Future? Unknown?).
ARM on 'wondows' seems like a not great idea, expecting weird sdr software to not work ,etc.
So that leaves paying decent $ for perhaps a lesser product..like a framework, but one that may last a longer time. Or at least work as long as the hardware works.
What do people do when faced with such (first world) things.
People have been saying this for as long as I can remember, and it has still never happened.
> Am I correct to worry about osx lock in, and 'sideloading' on osx being fully removed
Probably not
> vs pain in the ass
How is it even a pain in the ass now? Because you have to click through one dialog the first time you run an executable downloaded from the web?