Something's missing. Orientation in 3D space is a two-dimensional quantity; you would never need three dimensions to express it. The third dimension has to be providing some additional information, like a magnitude.
Something's missing. Orientation in 3D space is a two-dimensional quantity; you would never need three dimensions to express it. The third dimension has to be providing some additional information, like a magnitude.
> Only if you’re describing orientation as two orthogonal rotations.
No, the space has the dimensionality it has. You may choose to describe a 3D orientation with more than two numbers, but you won't stop it from being a two-dimensional quantity that way. If you use more than two numbers, those numbers will fail to be independent of each other.
Your comment is essentially correct if you replace the word "orientation" with "direction", though.
But I agree it is helpful to think of quaternions as direction and spin.