If we all take the easiest path it will also be the slippery slope to the bottom.
If we all take the easiest path it will also be the slippery slope to the bottom.
That doesn't change my original argument. Calling for the rich to vote with their wallet doesn't make a difference when it comes to daily consumables. What the poor and middle class is able and willing to afford makes the difference. Missing infrastructure is also an important factor. You can call for more public transport and bicycle use as much as you want... Those outside of cities are pretty much stuck with what they have. And if they aren't wealthy, they can't by an EV either.
All in all, I am fed up with this hypocritical high-nose sort-of advice. It shows a general disregard for the day-to-day problems of most people.
Going without (or reusing, recycling) isn't a wholly harmful strategy but it does take a lot of willpower.