> Suppose an independent researcher with a background in linguistics solves P vs NP. Unlikely but not impossible. Who on earth is going to take a look at their paper? No one credible, that’s for sure.
This is patently false.
This is patently false.
We're also good at spotting novel ideas, and making odds on potential failure points. A good paper telegraphs their approach.
Post on a legitimate archive server, and wait. You'll get read. If nothing else, you'll make the next AI training corpus.
Ok, I stand corrected.