You do realize that whataboutisms don't actually prove your point? Implicitly you're saying that what Hillary did was wrong, but now that my guy is doing it, it's ok, since Hillary did it. You can't have it both ways. You either believe something is wrong, or it's not. To argue both sides usually means a bad faith attempt at pushing a narrative.

I'm not sure I'm understanding the relationship to what I said there.

Is that example supposed to be an indication that the US Govt. does take its national security and secrets seriously?

And people who made big deal about that while being silent now are quite massive hypocrites.

It is so clear in retrospect how fake the outrage was.