My question is connected to his statement that he knows the following and is intended to verify if he really knows or is also making the mistake he is pointing out.
"The general trend is more towards extreme narcissism than enlightenment"
My question is connected to his statement that he knows the following and is intended to verify if he really knows or is also making the mistake he is pointing out.
"The general trend is more towards extreme narcissism than enlightenment"
Also by the fact that I am a random blowhard on the internet. :-)
You may disagree about my recommendation to stay away. Fine. However, do not pull this rhetorical trick on me. That is, require me to have a set of numbers to even state my opinion on a matter that, frankly, has no numbers, and could be argued either way by those so invested. Say what you mean... would you rather I use "seems to me to be" rather than "is"?
You see, as you may have noticed, there isn't a whole lot of information on the benefits of LSD. Just a lot of anecdotes and poorly designed research experiments. There are very well documented cases of the dangers. Whether that's due to bad genetics, bad dosing or impure samples, I don't know, but again, I think it's rather a dumb thing to risk your brain for.
"How do you recognize whether someone is Enlightened or not?"
If you can't define precisely what the question is, how can you begin to answer it? One might almost begin to suspect that the term "Enlightenment" is a load of bs ...