All I'm saying is that when you decide that there's only one morally superior way of looking at this, you're not looking hard enough. Adoptions are complicated, teenage parenthood is hard, what rights to bodily autonomy do we want, what are the rights for unborn babies?

If two rights clash, who gets to decide which right wins? There's always going to be exceptions, and a lot of the time I think it makes sense letting the people who will be directly affected make the hard choice. And calling them murderers is not helpful.