We are well past the point of diminishing returns in education: https://www.winginstitute.org/does-state-education-funding. Schools should probably focus on developing healthy kids while controlling ballooning costs.
> In 1985, based on the theory that funding would close education gaps, a judge ordered enormous spending increases in Kansas City Schools, tripling the district’s budget and enabling them to run through a wish list of everything they could dream of to close the gaps. They built new schools, created a busing plan, and reduced the student-teacher ratio to a record low nationwide, throwing money at the problem for more than a decade. But when the Supreme Court ordered a reversal in 1995, the district’s test scores had not improved, its black-white gap had not closed, and it was no more integrated than when it began.
The piece focuses more on encouraging separation of pupils by ability, instead of uniformly teaching to the median.
They're still not paying public school teachers nearly enough anywhere. And school facilities are crumbling in impoverished areas.
NCLBA was a disaster rammed through by the person least qualified to understand education, the bozo GWB, and without asking educators.
https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/total-government-expendit...
If GDP doubles and you go from $1 eggs to $2 eggs, GDP didn't actually grow or you are being swindled.
Expenses for a fixed goods and services should decrease as a percent of GDP over time. If they don't, that means spending is less efficient over time.