For some ISPs the abuse of user data is a known fact. So VPN is just the safer bet. But don't get me wrong, I'm not claiming this is impossible, it's just less likely.
For some ISPs the abuse of user data is a known fact. So VPN is just the safer bet. But don't get me wrong, I'm not claiming this is impossible, it's just less likely.
How long did the USA keep it hidden that they owned the Swiss company that manufactured encryption devices for other countries?
They are extremely adept at finding ways to use the secret knowledge without blowing their source. A good example of this is the scene in _The Imitation Game_ after they break the Enigma code for the first time, but Alan Turing explains that they can’t notify the allied ship convoy without leaking that fact.
With this in mind, I'll link my prev comment: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43095936
> Israel’s supply chain attack on Hezbollah’s pager source
You know, James Mickens, a CS researcher at Microsoft had a very related article (PDF), "This world of ours": https://www.usenix.org/system/files/1401_08-12_mickens.pdf
See Figure 1. He calls it the "Mossad / Not-Mossad threat model" :) (but, joking aside, it's good to identify oneself on a scale, or expectations for some system scale-wise and property-wise (incl. which security properties, esp. privacy vs. anonymity!) before looking closer at it.
If you need to protect yourself against the most sophisticated surveillance programs, a lot of opsec will be required.
VPNs can protect you against some creep in a public WiFi spying on your DNS request. It can protect against some low-tech state run mass surveillance.
Can you say "as long as you have nothing to hide"?
We’ve known since WW2 and maybe further that governments have used surveillance against innocents and people they didn’t like.
There is nothing preventing programs of that sort being used for industrial espionage.
What makes you think VPN is different.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2020/world/national-...