Any takers?
*AGI defined as smarter than a FAANG staff engineer on similar tasks.
I'm also willing to bet money, and I'd even thought of a challenge for 10x or 20x that amount
But if you want to bet, then you have to have something well-defined and interesting to bet on:
- leave out the term "AGI" - this only confuses things, because everyone has a different definition of it.
Just say what the problem is, precisely
- leave out "FAANG staff engineer". Because computers are already better than staff engineers on dozens and dozens of tasks, like adding two 32 bit numbers, or compiling C++ code, or running Python code. Not to mention certain things involving LLMs.
i.e. it's extremely obvious that LLMs are better at engineers at certain things -- the ones they choose to use LLMs for. That doesn't mean LLMs can replace them, which is often what people mean by "AGI".