>I think that's something that needs to be proven.

No, the burden of proof is on the opposite side. You don't take money from the people and from other projects, to throw at woke projects. There has to be some clean up, even more so since the government spending levels are at a crucial point.

And who is doing the Ctrl F cut? Has it happened already?

There wasn't any cut yet. Ctrl F would be the very first step in reexamining the entire set - of which the author of the article only looked at a 100.

The fact is that these complaints are against transparency and responsibility in this process, which is incoming and much needed.