Hacker News Reader

Given the alternative is no coverage, whatever he does is still going to be no worse than if such product never existed.

Well, I don't know. As @teeray pointed in another comment:

> Connectivity can actually cause some people to take risks where they otherwise wouldn’t, thinking a helicopter will drop out of the sky 30 minutes after dialing 911.

(quote from https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42996533)

I don't know, I can think of worse off situations. Example: We provide a service, make the customer feel they cannot do without the service, then we exploit the customer.

Real life examples: social media

Because that's disputed and it's the only example (from Starlink) you can come up with.

There's nothing he's done regarding Starlink in Ukraine that's of note besides denying a Ukrainian government request to enable to Starlink service in Crimea. That is literally it.

I don't get why people get so bent out of shape on this specific issue.

Like I'm a supporter of Ukraine so I'd love if Musk were more on their side but it's not a crime to not pick a side.