This would be a lot more powerful with a citation. I did read the article but didn’t find this story you are referring to.
https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/07/politics/musk-doge-staffers-f...
Hard to hold a discussion when everyone is arguing in bad faith.
They've ve deleted it now, I'm assuming because they didn't have a position they felt they could defend.
‘That report’ is based on a reporter hearing this statement at the town-hall, not innuendos and rumors. Your very statement that it was based on innuendo and rumors is poisoning the well.
I mean yeah, that's part of the problem -- there's no oversight here, by design.