Maybe you should think about it a while longer. Or find a friend who's better at coming up with ideas to help.
There are about a zillion other explanations. Maybe they think that "ANY messaging that encourages EVs dissuades the public from going public transport" and that's harmful. Maybe they see other EV makers as preferable to Tesla. Maybe they care deeply about global warming but just as you said, are letting their anger get in the way of that goal. Maybe they see the immediate harms of Musk's policies as a more urgent problem than climate change.
There's a tremendous leap between "Not supporting Tesla because of Musk" and climate denialism.
Not really. Because it doesn't matter if you choose to support an alternative EV maker. If you actively campaign against Tesla you are hurting EV sales. There are Tesla's built today that should be purchased instead of ICE vehicle. Anything you do that stops someone else (even if you're not going to buy them yourself) is actively hurting the fight against global warming.
The only reason you would hurt the fight against global warming, is that you don't think it's as important as your reason for hating Musk. And that's a form of denialism. You're denying (if only to yourself) that climate change is going to cause death and destruction.
There is nothing internally inconsistent about weighing the pros and cons and deciding what measures are and aren't worth the benefit considering the drawbacks.
It is not counterproductive to not want to financially support this person. He has already declared he's going to end EV subsidies, a much more damaging move than a theoretical handful of people deciding not to buy an EV, and he has repeatedly shown that the only thing he cares about is money. The majority party in Congress is not going to stop him, the president is not going to stop him, the only thing that will stop him is the prospect of losing money.
It isn't about messaging. It's what the current administration (which Musk is a part of) is doing.
This article is about the current administration stopping funding for EV chargers.
> Not everyone is paying attention
Yes. You should start paying attention. If you're serious about the fight against global warming, if you truly believe it's an existential threat, then you can no longer buy Tesla.
The capitalist class is driving climate change. If hurting one of the capitalist's brands by criticizing its CEO is the difference between success and failure in the fight against global warming, then the fight is already lost.
BTW, we're not going to consume our way out of global warming. We should be getting away from a two cars in every driveway culture if we're going to get serious about addressing the climate emergency.
One example: In 2024, the Ford Lightning was produced at a loss of $132,000 per vehicle.
https://www.f150lightningforum.com/forum/threads/ford-lost-1...
If Tesla is harmed, then mindshare/marketshare/investment can simply migrate to other companies.
You are literally saying that hurting Musk is more important than the fight against global warming. That sends the wrong message. And you would only be willing to send that message if you don't truly believe that climate change is an existential threat.
Nobody complains about how shitty the landlord is when their apartment is on fire, they just get busy putting out the fire and protecting their family and property.
They're already getting that when the leader of Tesla is in bed with the political party that denies climate change. You're also comparing a theoretical harm with an active and ongoing one.
All my arguments hold even if Musk and Trump are the devil incarnate. In fact, they may be the devil that convinces people to take their eye off the ball of climate change. They are exploiting people's emotions and hatred to do damage to the fight against climate change.
It doesn't matter what Musk Tweets, It doesn't matter how shitty Trump is. If you use that as an excuse to do anything less that 100% of what you can to help in the fight against climate change, then you are a climate change denier who doesn't really believe we're in a fight for our lives.
What does it cost anyone to support Tesla, or at least stay quiet about any opposition you feel toward them? Nothing. But people are so emotional that they'd rather speak out against Tesla than swallow their anger. And the only explanation for that, is they do not really believe in climate change.
Good grief. Can you hear yourself? Can you see what you're writing?
This bizarre weak submissiveness is exactly how you end up with an autocratic state.
The administration Musk is part of sure doesn't. It is halting permits for renewable energy projects and stopping funding for EV chargers:
https://apnews.com/article/wind-energy-offshore-turbines-tru...
https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/5105492-trump-...
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c20px1e05w0o
If you actually believe in global warming then you can longer buy Tesla.
> you wouldn't let your hatred for Musk hurt any company that is helping our fight against global warming.
Your bizarrely submissive attitude won't save the planet. You can submit to Musk if it helps you. No one else should.
There are plenty of other EVs to choose from. Buy one of those.