Why do they get to be the arbiter of what I can and can’t do?
Why do they get to be the arbiter of what I can and can’t do?
> Malls
The mall analogy doesn't work well because Apple isn't a mall in this case but more like a Wal-Mart. They aim to own the entire experience including the distribution of applications on the device. In the mall analogy Apple would own the mall and then each store could be viewed as an app that they allow in the mall.
Malls also limit what stores/apps can operate in them and have lots of rules. Where I live one of our more prominent malls requires tenants who are renting space at the mall to completely refresh the space or vacate after a certain number of years. Malls can arbitrarily raise rent and operating fees on the various shops within them too.
I'm not following your point now on the analogy. I thought we were talking about Apple and not individuals?
Sure you can. In Ohio the state controls liquor distribution so if you want to buy liquor at a grocery store you have to go into a separate area. Rated M games (when I was growing up at least) were locked in special cases. Sometimes truck stop stations sell pornography and it's behind the counter with a cover on it.
> Yes it pretty much is.
It's not.