A more constructive response is to explain why it won't work, rather than telling me to explain why it won't work.

My first post in this thread has a link that explains why VPN services aren't trustworthy.

But the thing I took more issue with is that Tor is omitted entirely. Tor is at least as safe as a VPN.

Trying to attack Tor users by registering exit nodes (a Sybil attack) is way more expensive than convincing users to simply not use Tor.

The fact that more effort is spent attacking Firefox (i.e., the Tor Browser) than the network is a data point worth considering when deciding your threat model.

https://www.malwarebytes.com/blog/news/2024/10/tor-browser-a...

Meanwhile, if you want to do traffic correlation against a VPN service that you don't already own, just pwn the datacenter that the VPN company is hosted in and watch packets coming in/out of the VPN.

If you want to try to reframe the conversation to be about defending Tor, you can have that conversation without me. I'm not here to defend Tor, I'm here to advise against using VPN services especially if you have a threat model where Tor is more appropriate.

Recommending ProtonVPN over Tor to motherfucking activists is an act of malfeasance that makes me distrust anything coming from this webpage.